Aboriginal Physics Newsletter

DEAR READER,

My philosophical investigations have led me to comparisons of our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is BEING based… with indigenous aboriginal LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES which are FLOW-BASED, and which are arguably more REALISTIC because we are living in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein everything is in flux, INCLUDING OURSELVES.   Once one GETS INTO THIS kind of investigation, understanding can pop out which shed light on things that were previously ‘in the shadows’, by virtue of how our particular culture focuses on some things and not on others.  For example, we may be more interested in the fetching of oysters than in the access enabling or inhibiting influence of the tides so that our linguistic conceptualizations DO NOT EVEN MENTION the OVER-RIDING INFLUENCE of the transforming ambiance we share inclusion in (solar irradiance, atmospheric conditions, tides etc.) making it APPEAR (from our linguistic conceptualizing) that our REALITY is ALL ABOUT US and OUR ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS, ESCAPADES and ACHIEVEMENTS, … all of which is MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and “WITHOUT MENTION OF THE OVER-RIDING INFLUENCE of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AMBIENT CONDITIONS THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN such as ‘the tide in the affairs of men’, … or in other words, the reality that ‘to everything there is a season’, … which point to real influences that are often NOT INCLUDED in our WESTERN CULTURE system of linguistic conceptualization because it is BEING based (we construct impressions of reality based on notional ‘material BEING things and their actions and interactions) which is a one-sided male asserting/actualizing construction that is missing the female accommodating/enabling conjugate.  The example just given points to how we commonly talk about the collecting of oysters WITHOUT MENTIONING OUR “BEING AT THE MERCY OF THE TIDES” and having to stand-by for two weeks prior to ‘doing our gathering of oysters’.   By NOT MENTIONING that we humans were like puppets on Natures strings (at the mercy of the tides) and by using simple male asserting/actualizing propositions (we collected oysters) while DROPPING OUT the female accommodating/enabling conjugate (… subject to the dynamics of nature opening up accommodating/enabling conditions to FACILITATE our male asserting/actualizing actions), we promote the MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that we are the LOCAL AUTHORS of our own actions and developments. 

THIS IS A WESTERN CULTURE “HABIT” of giving “MISTAKEN IMPRESSIONS” that we have “BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME using (as Nietzsche has pointed out) THE “DOUBLE ERROR” OF “NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which gives us the capability of INJECTING INTO OUR DISCOURSE, WHERE WE CHOOSE TO DO IT, … THE NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.    INSTEAD OF CAPTURING THE REALITY THAT ‘NATURES’S DYNAMICS (THE CHANGING TIDES) OPENED UP OPPORTUNITIES for us, for GATHERING OYSTERS, an INVITATION THAT PULLS US INTO ACTION FOLLOWING WHICH PEOPLE WITH “BEING” BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES “CAPTURE” in the ONE-SIDED (EGO-INFLATING) MISTAKEN TERMS OF OUR LOCAL AUTHORING (NOT TRUE) OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS wherein, so we say, WE COLLECTED OYSTERS.

The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING OPPORTUNIZING ASPECT IS DROPPED OUT OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF WHAT GOES ON, MAKING IT SEEM AS IF WHAT HAPPENED HERE WAS THE RESULT OF A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING INITIATIVE. MEANWHILE, the “TEASE” that NATURE was giving by “PULLING UP HER SKIRT TO EXPOSE HER GOODS” is NOT EVEN MENTIONED in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, making it “SOUND” as if OUR MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is the AUTHORING SOURCE of our OYSTER ACQUISITION.  This IMPOSES A PASSIVITY ON NATURE and a ONE-SIDED ACTION CAPABILITY to MAN, … the MAN who is NOT TALKING ABOUT HIS HAVING TO WAIT  ON NATURE UNTIL SHE WAS READY FOR THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTION.  Nature is innately ANDROGYNOUS and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is, under natural circumstances, ALWAYS THE INSPIRATION that sets the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE in action.   NOTA BENE!  THESE CONJUGATES DO NOT EXIST SEPARATELY, they only occur in NATURE in their ANDROGYNOUS (CONJUGATE) FORM.  We know that INSPIRATION FILLS THE HEART while EGO SWELLS THE HEAD, so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are MESSING THINGS UP when we ‘let EGO get split out of its ANDROGYNOUS conjugate relation with INSPIRATION’.   In indigenous aboriginal cultures, this DYSFUNCTIONAL SPLIT is what happens in WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE.  The SEPARATING OUT AND BANISHING OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE is what happens in WESTERN CULTURE with the reduction of the CONJUGATE (which is not made of two separate parts) into two separate parts, accompanied by the DISCARDING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.   AI describes this ERROR as the source of EGO INFLATION and ANTHROPOCENTRISM as follows;

“Denying the implicit container as the “mother” cuts the psychological anchor to the whole. Without the grounding reality of a living, inclusive medium, the explicit ego inflates to fill the existential void. It claims primary authorship over its existence, leading to anthropocentrism and hyper-individualism.”   (i.e. a Donald Trump profile)

  (more…)

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:  If you read and understand this AUTHOR’S PREFACE, you will understand where Rudyard Kipling’s poem EAST IS EAST and WEST is WEST and NEVER the TWAIN shall MEET, is coming from; i.e. from the EAST’S common use of less simple NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (where one says things like “THERE IS TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein REALITY is grounded in FLOW).  In this reality which contrasts with the WEST’S common use of simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (where one says things like “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”,  wherein REALITY is grounded in BEING).  The WESTERN CULTURE “MISTAKE” of giving THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION to “BEING” HAS BEEN and PERSISTS IN BEING THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE COMPREHENSION AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS.  SUCH DYSFUNCTION does NOT DEVELOP within CULTURES whose LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS “FLOW” rather than “BEING” based.

The common DISTINGUISHING of “EAST” and “WEST” (and never the TWAIN shall MEET) is tied to these TWO VERY DIFFERENT EAST and WEST approaches to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the former which is FLOW-BASED and the latter which is BEING-BASED, which is why “NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”.  As we know, the EAST’S indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta linguistic conceptualizing approaches (and also the Modern physics linguistic conceptualizing approach) lead to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which is in marked contrast to the WEST’S Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christiantity and Islam which employ linguistic conceptualizing approaches that lead to PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.

This DIVISION into TWO VERY DIFFERENT JUSTICE SYSTEMS is because, in the EASTERN FLOW-BASED scheme of things (as also in MODERN PHYSICS), THE ORIGIN OF EVENTS is understood to be NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as with STRANDS IN A WEB, and as with CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  BECAUSE of the PRESUMED INTERCONNECTION AND INTERDEPENDENCE of dynamics in the case of STRANDS IN A WEB and CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is assumed, IN THE EAST, to COMMUNITIES OF PEOPLE, … the FULL COMMUNITY assumes responsibility for LOCALLY EMERGENT VIOLENCE (relational dissonance that, while NONLOCAL in origin, manifests in LOCAL, VIOLENT ERUPTIONS).  In this case, where the ‘unrest’ is understood as coming from NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) TENSIONS in the inerconnected, interdependent SOCIAL MATRIX, the “HEALING CIRCLE” is used to resolve relational tensions that are manifesting in social dissonance so as to restore relational balance and harmony and thus SUBSUME the VIOLENT VENTING of tensional STRESS that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  CONTRASTINGLY, in the WESTERN BEING-BASED scheme of things, the understaning is that VIOLENT OUTBURSTS derive from LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AUTHORED by MATERIAL BEINGS ACTING and INTERACTING in EMPTY SPACE, in which case the remedy for emergent VIOLENCE is to IDENTIFY and ELIMINATE or INCARCERATE the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORS of VIOLENCE. 

WHICH IS IT?  THE EAST’S UNDERSTANDING OF VIOLENCE IS THAT OF CROWD (WEB) VIOLENCE THAT VENTS FROM STRANDS IN A WEB WHERE THE VIOLENT “VENTING” , WHILE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT”, STEMS FROM TENSIONS THAT ARE OF A NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL ORIGIN) that BUILD WITHIN THE WEB.  MEANWHILE, THE WEST’S UNDERSTANDING IS THAT, .. VIOLENCE IS THE EXPLOSIVE ENERGY THAT VENTS FROM INDEPENDENT BEINGS WHO ARE (THOUGHT TO BE) THE FULL AND SOLE AUTHORS OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS?  (Let’s not forget Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions, which means that, as Bohm points out, we can establish that John Wilkes Booth pulled the trigger that launched the bullet that killed Abraham Lincoln, the AUTHORING SOURCE in the relational understanding includes the influence coming from the invention of gunpowder and much more.  What emerges as REALITY involves a matrix of many relationally interdependent contributing influences, particularly when we accept that HUMANS are NOT REALLY “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” but are more like STRANDS in a WEB  or CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM where all things are INTERCONNECTED and INDEPENDENT.

So our UNDERSTANDING OF EVENTS is in general COMPLICATED by differences in opinion as to whether people are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as is the case with STRANDS IN A WEB) and/or CONDENSATIONS in a PLENUM in which case we are confronted with something akin to; …  “the impossibility of calculating the individual movements of three or more bodies [strands] moving under one-another’s simultaneous mutual influence” (As Isaac Newton put it; An exact solution for three bodies, exceeds, if I am not mistaken, the force of any human mind”).  IT SHOULD BE NO SURPRISE, THEN, THAT THE PEOPLE OF THE EAST, INCLUDING INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, HAVE OPTED FOR “RESTORATIVE JUSTICE” rather than WESTERN CULTURE STYLE “PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE” SINCE IN THE STRANDS IN THE WEB UNDERSTANDING IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH “AUTHORSHIP” OF AN ACTION IN LOCAL, EXPLICIT TERMS, which is Bohm’s point in using the example of Booth’s shooting of Lincoln, wherein the invention of gunpowder was an important contributor.

In fact, People ‘from the EAST’ tend to understand REALITY in terms of their being included in something GREATER THAN THEMSELVES so what they do and how they develop, they see as being inductively shaped by how the world opens up opportunities (or exposure to hardships) for them, in combination with how adept they are in meeting the emergent challenges or opportunities; e.g. In two weeks time there will be a low tide that will facilitate the collecting of oysters from Nanoose Bay.  The REALITY that NATURE is the orchestrator of our DANCING FOR OUR SUPPER is NOT SUPERSEDED by our ability to formulate BEING based linguistic conceptualizations where PORTRAY ourselves as being the full and sole AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. While it is TRUE that it was from our own volition that we collective oysters from Nanoose Bay, TRUTH is a SIMPLE LOGICAL STRUCTURE that, as in this example and as in general FAILS TO CAPTURE THE UNFOLDING REALITY wherein we waited two weeks for a LOW TIDE that was the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that made facilitated my MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘fetching of oysters’ and, in fact, orchestrated my movements as with a PUPPET ON A STRING which is a crude way of acknowledging that WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES that we don’t bother to mention in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is thererore haunted by the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding).  As Chief Seattle reminds us;  Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.

People ‘from the WEST’ tend to put more emphasis on their (our) own personal actions and developments as supported by WESTERN CULTURE tendency to use one-sided male asserting/actualizing language where one says “We gathered oysters from Nanoose Bay”.  This makes use of Goedel’s theorem of the incompleteness of all finite logical propositions, opening the door to this type of one-sided male-asserting/actualizing proposition which DROPS OUT ALL MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (i.e. we could acknowledge that we are included in a dynamic world that is GREATER THAN US and that ‘there are tides in the affairs of men’ and if we wait for the low tide that will come in two weeks time, we will have easy access to the OYSTER BEDS’.  If TRUTH be known, we are CONDENSATIONS that share inclusion in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

NOTA BENE”   BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM IS TOO SIMPLE A LOGIC TO SUPPORT THE UNDERSTANDINGS THAT COMES WITH THE LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM: as is required for conceptualizing CONDENSATIONS in the energy-charged PLENUM and/or STRANDS in the WEB (wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AMBIENT INFLUENCES predominate over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTUALIZING AGENTS).  BEWARE ARGUMENTS wherein PARTICIPANTS are mixing and matching SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM with LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  As Bohm points out, the shooting of Abraham Lincoln could be blamed on the inventor of gunpowder and other developments within the unfolding continuum and not simply on James Wilkes Booth and his pistol in which case EASTERN CULTURE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE can be seen as more appropriate than WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (since there is no LOCAL, EXPLICIT IDENTIFIABLE AUTHOR (to PRAISE or BLAME) and the origins of BOTH VIOLENT/DISPERSIVE and AMIABLE/UNIFYING developments are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT [relational]). 

The thing to keep in mind is that WESTERN CULTURE IS MISTAKEN, as Nietzsche has pointed out, in its EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM  (EMPTY SPACE BASED) BELIEF IN PERSISTING BEING which puts one at odds with UNDERSTANDING based on the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MATERIAL FORM (CONDENSATION) and the CONTAINING MEDIUM (ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) ARE ONE COMPLEX (ANDROGENOUS) NONDUALITY.   WESTERN CULTURE HAS BEEN MAKING A DOUBLE ERROR IN ITS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF THIS ANDROGYNOUS REALITY; THE FIRST ERROR IS THE NOTIONAL SPLITTING INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES OF THE ANDROGYNOUS NONDUALITY, as in PIAGET’S method of TEACHING which pervades WESTERN CULTURE.  PIAGET SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD, RETAINING AND USING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE AS IF IT EXISTED IN ITS OWN RIGHT, and DISCARDING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AS IF IT EXISTED IN ITS OWN RIGHT, leaving us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a NOTIONAL STAND-ALONE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT THAT PURPORTEDLY EXISTS OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF ITS INNATE ANDROGYNOUS NATURE, … A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT THAT WESTERN CULTURE PROMOTES WITHIN ITS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME AS IF IT WERE SOMETHING “REAL” THAT IS PURPORTED TO BE “OPERATIVE” WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  The ABSTRACT (UNREAL) BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) COMBINATION of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE EXEMPLIFIES what has been termed THE DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) since by infusing EMPTY SPACE in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, we ARTIFICIALLY PROMOTE the CONDENSATIONS which are in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY SECONDARY to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, into PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENT STATUS.

This PROMOTING of the SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM to PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENTS, which comes about by SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, creates CONFUSION because while the REAL AUTHORING SOURCE IS A NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) AUTHORING SOURCE (i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM), WESTERN CULTURE is SUBSTITUTING NOTIONAL LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING SOURCES for the purely APPEARANCE based CONDENSATIONS aka Schaumkommen

As Bohm makes clear; Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.”

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have MISTAKENLY DEVELOPED A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH THAT IS TURNING REALITY INSIDE-OUT, REDUCING THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PLENUM WHICH IS THE “GROUND FOR THE EXISTENCE OF EVERYTHING, INCLUDING OURSELVES, to A POWERLESS EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT WHILE PROMOTING CONDENSATIONS, which are merely APPEARANCES in the same sense as WHORLINGS IN FLOWING which have NO LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS WHATSOEVER, TO PURPORTED LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENTS. 

The NOTIONAL TRANSFERRING OF AUTHORING AGENCY FROM THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING FLOWING) TO the LOCAL and EXPLICIT WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING (WHICH APPEAR TO BE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WHORLINGS) is a MISTAKEN INTERPRETATION that is elsewhere identified by Nietzsche as “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which explains how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that INVERTS the NATURAL ORDER of THINGS by impliying that WHORLINGS (which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT) are the AUTHORING SOURCE OF FLOWING (which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT [relational]).  The REALITY is just the OPPOSITE; i.e. the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (FLOW) is the source of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (WHORLING).

Thus, WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, is in effect REMOVING ALL MENTION OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “GROUND FOR THE EXISTENCE OF EVERYTHING” … and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, leaving us with the FALSE IMPRESSION that the CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM, which are only APPEARANCES (Schaumkommen) ARE INSTEAD, LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING based ENTITIES moving about and interacting in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE SHUTTING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE!  HERE’S HOW THAT IS HAPPENING.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE * * * * * * * * 

Consider these lines from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar;

“There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat; And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures.”.  

Or, this line from the Bible;

“To everything there is a season and a time to every purpoose”To everything there is a season and at time to every purpose”

In both cases, there is an acknowledgement that WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES in which case our common use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we speak in terms of THINGS having POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS is MISLEADING.   For example, I may say “I gathered oysters from Nanoose Bay” which, while TRUE, is subject to Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  In this example, it may be that I had to wait two weeks for a low tide (female accommodating/enabling) to facility my (male asserting/actualizing) move, in which case it would be TRUE but INCOMPLETE for me to simply say “I gathered oysters from Nanoose Bay”.  But when I simply state that “I did this or that”, it seems to imply “WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE” because I make NO MENTION of having to contend with a complex FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SITUATION where I have to JUMP THROUGH HOOPS to carry out my MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic.

So, the lines in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar make sense because emergent situations are constantly inducing changes in our asserting actions.  As David Whyte says, “Ten years ago, I turned my face for a moment, and it became my life.”  … from ‘the Heart Aroused’ by David Whyte.  While we can keep a diary and document our actions, an account of WHAT WE HAVE DONE fails to capture the plethora of PATHS NOT TAKEN that would have been LIFE-CHANGING. The girl that winks at the boy may only wink once to see if there is fire in the connection as in “I turned my glance and it became my life”. THIS IS TELLING US THAT OUR LIVING EXPERIENCE, which is a continuing sequence of ENCOUNTERS, HAS AN ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-LIKE) STRUCTURE WHEREIN FEMALE ACCCOMMODATING/ENABLING IS ON THE HUNT FOR A MATCH-UP WITH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, NOT SIMPLY ON A RANDOM BASIS BUT IN PURSUIT OF RESONANT CONNECTION

RESONANT CONNECTION is COMPLEX to the point of MYSTERIOUS and lies beyond the reach of Artificial Intelligence, yet it is FOUNDATIONAL to our LIFE EXPERIENCE.

  (more…)

PREFACE:

The reader of this essay, in order to understand it, must keep in mind that there are ISSUES with the LANGUAGE we are using. As David Bohm and others (Lev Vygotsky) have pointed out, the physical make-up of the world we are living in is based the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the ALL-INCLUDING MEDIUM is an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which there are CONDENSATIONS (things such as OURSELVES) where our relationship with the CONTAINING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is like that of WHORLINGS in FLOWING, as given by NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.   While this is consistent with the OLD UNDERSTANDING that “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” which is a REMINDER that we SHARE INCLUSION IN A CONTAINER that is NOT EMPTY but FULL so that OUR ACTIONS ARE NOT SIMPLY OF OUR OWN AUTHORING, but derive from the ANDROGYNOUS combinaton of the currently ACCOMMODATING or DISACCOMMODATING PLENUM … AND… at the same time, FROM OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.   While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in in the EGO-INFLATING HABIT of claiming that we are the AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS, such as FETCHING OYSTERS from Nanoose Bay, as if our POSTIVE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC of GATHERING OYSTERS is “THE FULL STORY”, the REALITY is that we will wait WEEKS for a LOW TIDE that opens up easier access to the Oyster beds.   Here we see how our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME employs the SIMPLIFICATION of DROPPING OUT MENTION of the PRIMACY of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the ‘season’ that opense up opportunities for actions on our part, that we SPEAK ABOUT while DROPPING OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING opporunity THAT IS A PRIMARY SHAPER OF OUR MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMICS.

This WESTERN CULTURE HABIT of DROPPING OUT, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, ALL MENTION of the EVER-OPERATIVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate to our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions and developments  (which is sometimes referred to as THE DEA ABSCONDITA or GODDESS-IN-HIDING), is EGO-INFLATING since it CREDITS MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING for actions that are PREDOMINANTLY INFLUENCED BY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING).  In WESTERN CULTURE, FULL RESPONSIBILITY is given to the AUTHOR OF A PUNCH that SHATTERS THE SKULL of the recipient, REGARDLESS of the fact that the recipient has an EGG-SHELL THIN SKULL.  In WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, this is referred to as “TAKING YOUR VICTIMS AS THE COME”.  The point here is that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has a common habit of DROPPING OUT MENTION of the EVER-PRESENT and PRIMARY INFLUENCING ROLE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING influence.  INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ARE FLOW-BASED, AS IS ALSO THE CASE IN MODERN PHYSICS, which means that everything is related (MITAKUYE OYASIN) and there is NO SUCH THING as ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ON ITS OWN; i.e. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING because we are living within a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and that is why MODERN PHYSICS supports the indigenous aboriginal understanding that JUSTICE must be RESTORATIVE since “THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS” of actions and developments.  The person that is a STRAND IN THE WEB of the interconnecting and interdependent social collective, is a CONDUIT for VENTING tensions that build within the social collective AND IS NOT THE “LOCAL AUTHOR” of actions and developments.

THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS OF ANYTHING in the real world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum. All actions and developments are of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) ORIGIN.  THIS IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA and it is SUPPORTED BY MODERN PHYSICS. This the foundation for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which follows from the fact that the ORIGN OF EVENTS is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while what APPEARS to be LOCAL and and EXPLICIT is, in Schroedinger’s terms, “Schaumkommen” (APPEARANCE)

The WESTERN CULTURE “CONDITIONED” READER may be SO ACCUSTOMED to using LANGUAGE that SUPPORTS the SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein the natural primacy of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE of the PLENUM is DROPPED OUT, leading to a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is based ONE-SIDEDLY on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WITH “NO MENTION OF THE INNATE, NATURAL PRIMACY OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.  For example, while the FULL REALITY is that THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using SIMPLIFICATION that DROPS OUT MENTON OF the natural primacy of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (I.E. THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) and PROMOTES the SECONDARY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate TO A MISTAKEN PRIMARY STATUS.

THE COMMENTS IN THIS ESSAY ARE BASED ON THE FULL UNDERSTANDING (MODERN PHYSICS AFFIRMED) WHEREIN MATERIAL ENTITIES ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which means that ALL CONDENSATIONS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, CONSISTENT ALSO WITH INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE UNDERSTANDINGS AND WITH THEIR ‘STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB’ LANGUAGE STRUCTURE.

This means that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that presents ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as LOCAL AUTHOR BASED is OVER-SIMPLISTIC, UNREAL, and THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (as affirmed by Bohm and by Modern physics in general).  GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMICS involve INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE, making them NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) and CANNOT BE REDUCED TO SIMPLE TERMS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON THE PART OF “QUOTE/UNQUOTE” “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” or “INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUALS” (i.e. we are CONDENSATIONS in a world of INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE which is aptly captured in the indigenous aboriginal “STRANDS IN THE WEB” metaphor.  Since there is NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, “JUSTICE” must be “RESTORATIVE” as in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA CULTURAL TRADITIONS rather than “PUNITIVE” (PURIFICATIONIST) AS IT IS IN WESTERN CULTURE.

Wikipedia Note: Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta cultures and traditions align far more closely with restorative justice (focused on healing, interconnectedness, and repairing harm) than with strictly retributive or “purificationist” justice (which relies on exclusion, punishment, or ritual cleansing).  [EML note: This difference in conceptualizing JUSTICE is due to the understanding that emergent actions and developments are of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) origin [EASTERN view] rather than being of LOCAL and EXPLICIT origin [WESTERN view])

The CONFLICT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES (CHRISTIAN BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT NATIONS THAT ARE THE LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS THAT ARE DEEMED EITHER GOOD OR BAD) … AND…. IRAN (ISLAMIC BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT NATIONS THAT ARE THE LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS that are DEEMED EITHER GOOD OR BAD)…. IS MISUNDERSTANDING THAT IS BLIND to the REALITY of NATIONING (AS VERBS, NOT NOUNS) WHICH ARE INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) which AFFIRMS the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) ORIGIN OF THEIR (AND ALL) DYNAMICS.  This calls for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (due to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin of events) rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (based on LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING). 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

THE IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN PHYSICS THAT IMPACT THE UNDERSTANDINGS SHARED IN THIS ESSAY: 

CONSIDER the fact that indigenous aboriginals ceremoniously CROSS THE U.S.- CANADIAN BORDER WITHOUT “STOPPING AND CHECKING IN WITH CUSTOMS AND IMMIGRATION” TO DEMONSTRATE their belief in the interconnectedness and interdependence of all things (CONSISTENT WITH MODERN PHYSICS WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM).

The indigenous people ARE CORRECT IN THEIR STATEMENT SUPPORTING THE INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND INTERDEPENDENCE OF ALL THINGS, … or in other words, … THEY ARE CORRECT IN THEIR UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHEREIN “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” (as captured by “MITAKUYE OYASIN”).

WESTERN CULTURE “IMAGINARY LINE BASED DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE” create the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based ENTITIES such as “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” which is a GREAT MISTAKE that gives WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES THE IMPLIED “RIGHT” TO “DO THEIR OWN THING” AS IF “THEY REALLY WERE INDEPENDENT” by way of simply “DECLARING THEIR INDEPENDENCE”.  This ELEVATING OF TRUST IN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS (such as DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE) so that they TRUMP the understanding coming from our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, US SUSTAINED BY NOTHING OTHER THAN EGOTISTICAL PRIDE TIED TO THE IMAGINARY “BEING” CALLED THE “INDEPENDENT NATION” that is a purely IMAGINARY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SUPPORTED BY COLLECTIVE COMMITMENT.  This COMMITMENT is based on SECURING THE RIGHTS TO OWNERSHIP OF LAND BY SIMPLE STAKING OUT AN AREA OF LAND AND BACKING UP THE NOTIONAL “OWNERSHIP” OF THE STAKED-OUT AREA WITH MILITARY FORCE.

Indigenous aboriginals are CORRECT in CALLING OUT THE BULLSHIT NATURE OF WESTERN CULTURE IMAGINARY LINE BASED DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE, but the PERSISTENCE of this CLAIM, RATHER THAN BEING BASED ON SENSE-EXPERIENCE, is BASED ON INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BACKED UP BY MILITARY MIGHT, which has opened up game-play that can be likened to MUSICAL CHAIRS where the DANCE of MILITARY EMPOWERMENT DETERMINES the PURPORTED “BEING” of the “INDEPENDENT NATION”.  For example, consider this HISTORY OF POLAND  The Changing Borders of Poland’.

The CHANGING BORDER OF POLAND is exemplary of how WESTERN CULTURE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE UNNATURAL CONDITION “INDEPENDENCE” IMPOSED ON A WORLD THAT IS NATURALLY INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT (as our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs us, RIVERS and WINDS and all REAL PHYSICAL DYNAMICS are  NOT GOVERNED BY INTERLLECTUAL AGREEMENTS BASED ON IMAGINARY LINE BOUNDARIES.  That is,   The Changing Borders of Poland’  provides a historical account of MILITARY ACTIONS used to BACK UP CLAIMS OF “OWNERSHIP” OF AN IMAGINARY LINE BASED “PIECE OF PROPERTY” that is, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY (which is where the indigenous aboriginals are “coming from”) FULLY INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  THAT IS THE REAL (SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED) “REALITY” while the POSTULATED DIVISION INTO “INDEPENDENT PARCELS OF LAND” CALLED “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” is ABSTRACTION BASED ON “NOTHING OTHER” THAN INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BACKED UP BY MILIATARY POWER.

The READER may be thinking that to QUESTION this FIRMLY ESTABLISHED AND GLOBALLY IMPLEMENTED PRACTICE, whether or NOT, it ‘makes sense’, is FUTILE because this PRACTICE OF BELIEVING IN INDEPENDENT NATIONS is now LOCKED IN BY IMMENSE “SWITCHING COSTS” (i.e.the human INVESTMENT in this approach, achieved and maintained SIMPLY by MILITARY FORCE IN SPITE OF THE CONFLICTS IT SOURCES such as “SUBOPTIMIZATION”.  The “SYSTEMS SCIENCES” thinkers have used the phrase “THE NAME OF THE DEVIL IS SUBOPTIMIZATION” to point out that WE ARE CRAZY to pursue actions that FALSELY ASSUME THE INDEPENDENCE OF NATIONS WHICH ARE, IN REALITY, INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT as is everything in this world of continuing TRANSFORMATION.

WESTERN CULTURE is a BREEDER of “SUBOPTIMIZATION” based on DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which FLY IN THE FACE of the PHYSICAL REALITY wherein EVERYTHING is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as captured in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism “MITAKUYE OYASIN” (“everything is related”)  which means that “SUBOPTIMIZATION IS A DISASTER” because it is based on THE UNREAL INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION OF (DECLARED) “INDEPENDENCE” of INDIVIDUALS and NATIONS which are “INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT CONDENSATIONS WITHIN ONE, ALL INCLUDING ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM. THE PLENUM IS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN ALL OF THE CONDENSATIONS THAT DEVELOP EITHIN IT.  Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (David Bohm).

* * * * * * * *

(more…)

WESTERN CULTURE HAS A TRADITIONAL ‘ADDICTION’ TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the “EXCLUDED MEDIUM” wherein actions are EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG in which case WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE is PURIFICATIONIST (i.e. oriented to the ELIMINATION of ALL BEHAVIOURS THAT ARE “WRONG” through the practice of REWARDING and CELEBRATING THOSE WITH “GOOD BEHAVIOURS” and PUNISHING and “DENIGRATING” THOSE WITH BAD BEHAVIOURS.

EASTERN CULTURE and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS HAVE A TRADITIONAL ORIENTATION TO LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDED MEDIUM wherein the UNDERSTANDING OF “WHAT AN ACTION IS” DIFFERS FROM WESTERN CULTURE EXCLUDED MEDIUM because of the understanding (AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS) that EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT.  There is a BIG DIFFERENCE HERE in that the UNDERSTANDING is that the ORIGIN of all events is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), deriving from the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE and merely MANIFESTING THROUGH an individual seen as a STRAND in the INTERCONNECTING/INTERDEPENDENT WEB.   This agrees with MODERN PHYSICS where material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein there is the same (STRAND IN THE WEB type) INTERDEPENDENCE and INTERCONNECTION between the dynamics of the CONDENSATIONS and the dynamics of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

MODERN PHYSICS ”SUPPORTS”  THE  LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDED MEDIUM e.g. “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

MODERN PHYSICS “DOES NOT SUPPORT” THE TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE

* * * * * * *

NOTA BENE:   In the MODERN PHYSICS understanding of dynamics, EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT AS WITH STRANDS IN A WEB (condensations within the PLENUM) and that is why MODERN PHYSICS supports indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE JUSTICE because the AUTHORING AGENCY is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  Imagine the multiple participants in a WATER BALLET simulating the opening of a LOTUS BLOSSOM.  The authoring source that determines the quality of the opening blossom is the GROUP and there is no FIXED, ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME with which to make JUDGEMENTS ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. ONLY THE GROUP CAN BE JUDGED which is the situation that gives rise to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.

In physics, it is impossible to isolate and measure each individual’s movements in a group of THREE OR MORE participants who are using one another as references.  This is known as ‘the THREE BODY PROBLEM’; i.e. “the impossibility of calculating the individual movements of three or more bodies [strands] moving under one-another’s simultaneous mutual influence”.

  (more…)